'A Gate at the Stairs' is good, but is it great?

book reviews, Books, Writing

gateatstairsOh how I love it when the New York Times serves up decidedly different takes on the same book in its daily and weekly pages. Michiko Kakutani delivered a tough but largely positive review of Lorrie Moore’s “A Gate at the Stairs” in Friday’s paper, whereas Jonathan Lethem out and out raves about it in the paper’s Sunday book review section, suggesting that doubters ought to have their head examined.

So which is it? I have an even more mixed take on the book. There was much to love in “A Gate at the Stairs” — narrator Tassie Keltjin is affecting, as is her quirky family — but its weaknesses bugged me long after I finished reading. The plot, tied to fallout from 9/11, begs credulity. And I generally find it annoying when authors withhold key plot information under the guise of character obliviousness or diffidence, as was the case here. Killer closing lines couldn’t quite make up for those deficiencies.

Kakutani notes Moore’s clumsy job orchestrating certain revelations and an unfortunate tendency toward wordplay, but forgives those weaknesses, judging “A Gate at the Stairs” the author’s best book yet.

“If Ms. Moore, who started out as a short-story writer, demonstrates some difficulty here in steering the big plot machinery of a novel, she is able to compensate for this by thoroughly immersing the reader in her characters’ daily existences,” Kakutani writes.

'Born Round': the guy always loved to eat

book reviews, Writing

bornround1Many a foodie would kill for the job that Frank Bruni is leaving voluntarily. But how many of them have as complicated a relationship with eating as the outgoing NYT restaurant critic? In “Born Round,” Bruni chronicles his love for food, and battle to control his appetite, which he had finally gotten under control by the time he took the job. Few writers would be able to pull off these stories the way Bruni did. Read my review in today’s LA Times.

‘Age Is Just a Number’: Now we’re talking!

Books, TV, Writing

agejustnumberAnd now, for a reminder that middle-age need not mean sitting around whinging, I bring you Dara Torres. The Olympian who mounted an improbable comeback at age 41 is still competing one year later despite pesky knee problems and a rambunctious toddler at home.

Over the weekend, she competed in the world swimming finals for the 50 meter free, alas finishing eighth. Tonight she’s skedded to appear on “The Daily Show.”

She took time out of the pool long enough last year to pen “Age Is Just a Number” with coauthor Elizabeth Weil. In this frank account, published in April, Torres talks about her struggles with bulimia, failed marriages and other missteps along the way to her fifth Olympic Games in Beijing. It hasn’t always been easy but Torres isn’t the type to scare off easily; she has always been blessed with a strong competitive drive and financial resources to pull her through various setbacks.

Best of all: She never intended her last comeback, but rather fell into it after resuming swimming during pregnancy.

“I didn’t consult any scientists to see if my comeback plans were crazy,” she writes. “I suppose I didn’t want to hear if they were. But later I learned that lifestyle, not genetics, is the primary reason older athletes slow down, and that made a lot of sense to me.”

Torres hasn’t ruled out the 2012 Games, but for now she’s ready for a much needed break. The rest of us would be well-served to heed her message: Don’t let age make you give up on your dream.

Earlier: Oh snap out of it: Why midlife crises can be so boring, Lessons from my mother

Oh snap out of it: Why midlife crises can be so boring

Books, Writing

slipperyyearYou know the saying that happy families are all alike? I’m thinking there should be an addendum: Midlife crisis stories are inherently boring. Vague unease and ennui do not make for compelling drama.

Latest case in point: “The Slippery Year,” by Melanie Gideon. I so wanted to like the book, which got a write-up in today’s NYT in advance of its arrival next week, that I plowed my way through it waiting for the revelation or wisdom that would make reading it seem worthwhile. Sadly, it never came.

Gideon, no doubt a nice person if you know her, makes much too much ado about mundane domestic details and disappointments. Her husband buys a big motor home; she hates it. Her son needs a new Halloween costume; she’s a bad mother for talking him into trick-or-treating as wrongly incarcerated fallen angel. The dog dies. She and her husband can’t find a new bed they can both sleep upon. And so on.

Will this marriage last? Can she shake out of her funk? Do we really care? Gideon certainly isn’t interesting or insightful enough to make me care about her particular blues.

Glad she asked! ‘Free’ prodder

Books, digital media, N.Y. Times, Writing

Deborah Solomon, she of the penetrating questions, took Chris Anderson to task for l’affaire Wikipedia in yesterday’s NYT, eliciting a revealing exchange.

First she asked whether he considered plagiarism an extension of his freebie thesis, which batted down thusly:

“I wish I could explain all my actions as being intellectually consistent, but this one is just plain old sloppiness. There are questions about whether one should cite Wikipedia, and I’m one of those who think you should.”

Nice slight of hand: He starts out on a self-deprecating note, then asserts a sense of honor about, of all things, crediting Wikipedia in a supposedly rigorous economic treatise. Luckily, Solomon calls him on it.

“Frankly, if you want to be a public intellectual, you shouldn’t be using Wikipedia to research a book of ideas in the first place,” she observes.

Anderson’s less than satisfactory response: “The level of scholarship and analysis on Wikipedia is improving by the day, and we ignore it at our peril.”

Again, note the self-righteous tone. Anderson clearly has the power of his convictions.

Solomon also touches on the quality issue, which bugged me so, noting that people have proven willing to pay subscription fees for HBO, but Anderson rejects that model as so 15 years ago. “The marketplace wants free,” he parries. “Consumers want free, and if you decide to set up a subscription service, then your competitor will make a free one.”

Did I miss something here? Is HBO really suffering because of the free TV or Web programming? If anything, struggles to replicate earlier programming success — a quality issue — seem to have been the issue. And I won’t even reiterate the iTunes example. Oh wait, I just did.

‘Stuffed’: Not nearly tasty enough

Books, New England, Writing
Norwich Inn: Their burgers are just right

Norwich Inn: The burgers are just right

When I went to New England not that long ago, one thing that struck me was the retro portions restaurants served. It seemed so old-fashioned — and so right.

A sandwich at a Woodstock, Vt., luncheonette evoked childhood meals made with Pepperidge Farm slices, easily a third smaller than those from typical loafs these days. A burger at a nearby historic inn was properly proportioned as well, and accompanied by tasty greens and a smattering of chips. Even the bakeries in New England seemed like throwbacks: No huge gobs of icing or ridiculously large portions, as commonly found even in supposedly diet conscious L.A.

Naturally, it made me wonder: Did flinty New Englanders simply reject the Super Size trend? Are their waistbands smaller as a consequence? A quick check of national obesity levels confirmed my suspicion: New England has the lowest level in the country, tho sad to say it is on the rise there as well. The South wins the dubious honor as most obese; individual states like California have pockets of greater and lower obesity.

stuffed“Stuffed,” a book by a former General Mills and Coca-Cola exec, attempts to explain why America has grown so fat. With the zeal of a reformed smoker, Hank Cardello points his finger at a wide array of culprits: packaged good companies, grocers, restaurants, schools and sedentary consumers who just don’t know how to say no. He outlines the economic reasons behind upsizing and school deals with fast food companies, as well as the cautious resistance to any change in status quo.

Sprinkled throughout are his well meaning, but at times dubious suggestions for ways to reduce Americans’ caloric load. He spends a lot of time, for example, outlining his efforts to convince fast food restaurants to switch to healthier frying oil, and his failed attempt to convince General Mills to create a healthy kids food line under the Sprout name. But it’s not clear how much a difference either would have made. He also suggests a healthier type of Nestle Crunch bar while seemingly endorsing the recent changes in chocolate standards; never does he acknowledge the fact that the “improved” chocolate tastes much worse. Nestle Crunch bars, like so much American chocolate these days, taste waxy and devoid of flavor; not much of a treat to eat.

People like to eat in Stockton, Calif.

People like to eat in Stockton, Calif.

In other parts of the book, Cardello acknowledges that foodies pay more for smaller portions made from better (and tastier) ingredients. Is there no way to move back in that direction, rather than tinkering with the formula of oils and sugars used to make popular junk food? Why can’t more food purveyors take a page out of New England’s book?

The other drawback to “Stuffed” is the prose itself. Cardello, who co-authored it with journo Doug Garr, is regrettably earnest. And even when he’s addressing a topic with much comic potential — as the “Cupcake Wars” at schools — he plays it lamentably straight.
“Will the cupcake survive the obesity wars, or will it suffer the fate of other, less worthy, food casualties?” he queries, somewhat portentously.

Nonetheless, Cardello should be lauded for shining a spotlight on this perplexing problem, and sharing his insider’s take on how it got so huge.

Graveside rewards

Books, DG Creations, Surf N Pixels, Writing

I’m not big on graveyards, but on my quick jaunt through New England, couldn’t resist a visit to the Sleepy Hollow cemetery in Concord, Mass., where many a famous writer is buried. As I’ve gotten older, I’ve grown to appreciate the engravings on those markers, the appeal of which escaped me as a kid when my Dad went through his embarrassing gravestone rubbing phase. Walking through the cemetery, I couldn’t help but imagine the families so lovingly memorialized  on these markers.

But I was even more amused by the modern offerings up on Author’s Ridge. My favorite: the Obama pin nestled next to a well-thumbed copy of “Walden” at Henry David Thoreau’s marker. The first shot is of the Thoreau plot, the second a close-up of H.D.’s marker, with the blue Obama pin barely visible.

thoreauplotthoreaucloseup

Closing Time: A Mean Machine Explains How He Got That Way

Books, Writing

closingtimeWanna know why Joe Queenan’s so mean? His Dad was a nasty drunk. And they lived in the projects! What a salve that must be for the stars he has so relentlessly skewered over the years. 

Queenan attempts to come to grips with his father’s legacy in “Closing Time,” but refuses to forgive him or apologize for his own nasty streak. Mostly he piles on the punishing details, describing in graphic detail his father’s beatings and his mother’s apparent indifference. And let’s not forget the family’s shameful slide into poverty in 1950s Philadelphia. 

“No afterglow accompanies these experiences,” Queenan writes a couple chapters in. “Nothing good ever came out of living in that project. One might argue that the degrading experience of poverty taught me to be ambitious and self-sufficient, but it would be more accurate to say that it taught me to be ruthless and cruel, indifferent to other people’s feelings, particularly if I was writing about them.” 

Pretty insightful. But Queenan immediately pivots blame on Hollywood for romanticizing the poor. It’s up to the reader to connect the dots between his previously stated impatience with the supposed problems of the non-poor and his evisceration of indulged Hollywood stars.

How cruel can he be? Sony was so outraged by Queenan’s vicious early 1990s takedown of Barbra Streisand that it threatened to withhold advertising from Movieline for a year. This pleased the editors tremendously — oh, how they cackled when the publisher told them about it — but I could see Sony’s point. Parts of “Sacred Cow” may have been wickedly funny but the article was undeniably mean. Queenan specialized in such pieces for the mag, then in its heyday of snarkiness, and has made a tidy sum wielding his poison pen for a series of major publications over the years, as he reminds us more than once in his memoir.

And to think he seriously considered entering the priesthood! But hey, there’s more money in sarcasm. 

Queenan does have a nice eye for telling detail: He vividly evokes Philadelphia’s modest Quaker-infused ethos, and the clannishness of its Irish Catholic enclaves in those eras, some of which overlap my stints in the city and its suburbs. The names were familiar, if not the particulars. 

orangecountyAlas, Queenan’s wicked wit is mostly absent in “Closing Time”; he’s too focused on chronicling the horrors he survived. It’s too bad he couldn’t have taken the page out of much younger Mexican-American satirist Gustavo Arellano’s recent memoir cum history, “Orange County.” Arellano’s father also battled the bottle, albeit more successfully than Queenan’s dad, and his family also lived in wretched housing, but the twentysomething scribe does not hold a grudge at his family, preferring to lampoon the county’s racist past and present.  

What would a younger, snarkier Joe make of his brutalizing march through the past? Hard to say. It’s also unclear whether Queenan successfully exorcised his demons with this tome; he admits that incidents from his past haunt him still, citing “beatings, lies, gruesome dental experiences, hijacked piggy banks, being sent to bed on an empty stomach.” Fortunately, the epilogue offers a brief ray of hope that, some 10 years after his father died, he’s found some peace through a satisfactory relationship with his own children. 

So maybe the cycle won’t repeat itself.

They didn’t get it then, don’t get it now

book reviews, Books, Writing

indecentFaced with proof that then Columbia prexy David Begelman forged checks, what did the company do? Throw him out on his ear? No, the board pressured top exec Alan Hirschfeld to keep the repentant former agent on staff, arguing that he was a good leader, and besides, the amount of money he stole wasn’t really that much.

Never mind the fact that Columbia, then as now, was a publicly traded company and the news was sure to leak out eventually.

“Indecent Exposure,” David McClintick’s absorbing chronicle of the late 1970s check kiting scandal, unfolds like a slow train wreck.  Reading it today, the parallels between the board’s arrogance and the banking industry’s recent behavior is hard to miss. 

The same type of moral relativism that financiers like Herb Allen employed informs today’s arguments that those AIG execs really deserve those retention bonuses despite having helped bring down the global economy. At the time of the Begelman scandal there was much tut-tutting over Hollywood’s laissez faire attitude toward such ethical breaches — supposedly Judy Garland waved off talk that Begelman had embezzled her while her agent — but the East Coast moneymen on Columbia’s board at the time seem to be just as tone deaf as producer Ray Stark, a tireless advocate for his pal Begelman.

Quite simply, they acted as if the normal rules did not apply to them. And this, McClintick reminds more than once, was but a few years after the Watergate scandal brought down the similarly arrogant Nixon administration. “All the President’s Men” had hit theaters the year before.   

Remarkable.